MORTALIUM ANIMOS
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XI
ON RELIGIOUS UNITY
TO OUR VENERABLE BRETHREN THE PATRIARCHS, PRIMATES,
ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS, AND OTHER LOCAL ORDINARIES
IN PEACE AND COMMUNION WITH THE APOSTOLIC SEE.
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XI
ON RELIGIOUS UNITY
TO OUR VENERABLE BRETHREN THE PATRIARCHS, PRIMATES,
ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS, AND OTHER LOCAL ORDINARIES
IN PEACE AND COMMUNION WITH THE APOSTOLIC SEE.
Venerable Brethren, Health and Apostolic Benediction.
Never perhaps in the past have we seen, as we see in these our own times, the
minds of men so occupied by the desire both of strengthening and of extending to
the common welfare of human society that fraternal relationship which binds and
unites us together, and which is a consequence of our common origin and nature.
For since the nations do not yet fully enjoy the fruits of peace - indeed rather
do old and new disagreements in various places break forth into sedition and
civic strife - and since on the other hand many disputes which concern the
tranquillity and prosperity of nations cannot be settled without the active
concurrence and help of those who rule the States and promote their interests,
it is easily understood, and the more so because none now dispute the unity of
the human race, why many desire that the various nations, inspired by this
universal kinship, should daily be more closely united one to another.
2. A similar object is aimed at by some, in those matters which concern the
New Law promulgated by Christ our Lord. For since they hold it for certain that
men destitute of all religious sense are very rarely to be found, they seem to
have founded on that belief a hope that the nations, although they differ among
themselves in certain religious matters, will without much difficulty come to
agree as brethren in professing certain doctrines, which form as it were a
common basis of the spiritual life. For which reason conventions, meetings and
addresses are frequently arranged by these persons, at which a large number of
listeners are present, and at which all without distinction are invited to join
in the discussion, both infidels of every kind, and Christians, even those who
have unhappily fallen away from Christ or who with obstinacy and pertinacity
deny His divine nature and mission. Certainly such attempts can nowise be
approved by Catholics, founded as they are on that false opinion which considers
all religions to be more or less good and praiseworthy, since they all in
different ways manifest and signify that sense which is inborn in us all, and by
which we are led to God and to the obedient acknowledgment of His rule. Not only
are those who hold this opinion in error and deceived, but also in distorting
the idea of true religion they reject it, and little by little. turn aside to
naturalism and atheism, as it is called; from which it clearly follows that one
who supports those who hold these theories and attempt to realize them, is
altogether abandoning the divinely revealed religion.
3. But some are more easily deceived by the outward appearance of good when
there is question of fostering unity among all Christians.
4. Is it not right, it is often repeated, indeed, even consonant with duty,
that all who invoke the name of Christ should abstain from mutual reproaches and
at long last be united in mutual charity? Who would dare to say that he loved
Christ, unless he worked with all his might to carry out the desires of Him, Who
asked His Father that His disciples might be "one."[1] And did not the
same Christ will that His disciples should be marked out and distinguished from
others by this characteristic, namely that they loved one another: "By this
shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love one for
another"?[2] All Christians, they add, should be as "one": for
then they would be much more powerful in driving out the pest of irreligion,
which like a serpent daily creeps further and becomes more widely spread, and
prepares to rob the Gospel of its strength. These things and others that class
of men who are known as pan-Christians continually repeat and amplify;
and these men, so far from being quite few and scattered, have increased to the
dimensions of an entire class, and have grouped themselves into widely spread
societies, most of which are directed by non-Catholics, although they are imbued
with varying doctrines concerning the things of faith. This undertaking is so
actively promoted as in many places to win for itself the adhesion of a number
of citizens, and it even takes possession of the minds of very many Catholics
and allures them with the hope of bringing about such a union as would be
agreeable to the desires of Holy Mother Church, who has indeed nothing more at
heart than to recall her erring sons and to lead them back to her bosom. But in
reality beneath these enticing words and blandishments lies hid a most grave
error, by which the foundations of the Catholic faith are completely destroyed.
5. Admonished, therefore, by the consciousness of Our Apostolic office that
We should not permit the flock of the Lord to be cheated by dangerous fallacies,
We invoke, Venerable Brethren, your zeal in avoiding this evil; for We are
confident that by the writings and words of each one of you the people will more
easily get to know and understand those principles and arguments which We are
about to set forth, and from which Catholics will learn how they are to think
and act when there is question of those undertakings which have for their end
the union in one body, whatsoever be the manner, of all who call themselves
Christians.
6. We were created by God, the Creator of the universe, in order that we might know Him and serve Him; our Author therefore has a perfect right to our service. God might, indeed, have prescribed for man's government only the natural law, which, in His creation, He imprinted on his soul, and have regulated the progress of that same law by His ordinary providence; but He preferred rather to impose precepts, which we were to obey, and in the course of time, namely from the beginnings of the human race until the coming and preaching of Jesus Christ, He Himself taught man the duties which a rational creature owes to its Creator: "God, who at sundry times and in divers manners, spoke in times past to the fathers by the prophets, last of all, in these days, hath spoken to us by his Son."[3] From which it follows that there can be no true religion other than that which is founded on the revealed word of God: which revelation, begun from the beginning and continued under the Old Law, Christ Jesus Himself under the New Law perfected. Now, if God has spoken (and it is historically certain that He has truly spoken), all must see that it is man's duty to believe absolutely God's revelation and to obey implicitly His commands; that we might rightly do both, for the glory of God and our own salvation, the Only-begotten Son of God founded His Church on earth. Further, We believe that those who call themselves Christians can do no other than believe that a Church, and that Church one, was established by Christ; but if it is further inquired of what nature according to the will of its Author it must be, then all do not agree. A good number of them, for example, deny that the Church of Christ must be visible and apparent, at least to such a degree that it appears as one body of faithful, agreeing in one and the same doctrine under one teaching authority and government; but, on the contrary, they understand a visible Church as nothing else than a Federation, composed of various communities of Christians, even though they adhere to different doctrines, which may even be incompatible one with another. Instead, Christ our Lord instituted His Church as a perfect society, external of its nature and perceptible to the senses, which should carry on in the future the work of the salvation of the human race, under the leadership of one head,[4] with an authority teaching by word of mouth,[5] and by the ministry of the sacraments, the founts of heavenly grace;[6] for which reason He attested by comparison the similarity of the Church to a kingdom,[7] to a house,[8] to a sheepfold,[9] and to a flock.[10] This Church, after being so wonderfully instituted, could not, on the removal by death of its Founder and of the Apostles who were the pioneers in propagating it, be entirely extinguished and cease to be, for to it was given the commandment to lead all men, without distinction of time or place, to eternal salvation: "Going therefore, teach ye all nations."[11] In the continual carrying out of this task, will any element of strength and efficiency be wanting to the Church, when Christ Himself is perpetually present to it, according to His solemn promise: "Behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world?"[12] It follows then that the Church of Christ not only exists to-day and always, but is also exactly the same as it was in the time of the Apostles, unless we were to say, which God forbid, either that Christ our Lord could not effect His purpose, or that He erred when He asserted that the gates of hell should never prevail against it.[13]
7. And here it seems opportune to expound and to refute a certain false
opinion, on which this whole question, as well as that complex movement by which
non-Catholics seek to bring about the union of the Christian churches depends.
For authors who favor this view are accustomed, times almost without number, to
bring forward these words of Christ: "That they all may be one.... And
there shall be one fold and one shepherd,"[14] with this signification
however: that Christ Jesus merely expressed a desire and prayer, which still
lacks its fulfillment. For they are of the opinion that the unity of faith and
government, which is a note of the one true Church of Christ, has hardly up to
the present time existed, and does not to-day exist. They consider that this
unity may indeed be desired and that it may even be one day attained through the
instrumentality of wills directed to a common end, but that meanwhile it can
only be regarded as mere ideal. They add that the Church in itself, or of its
nature, is divided into sections; that is to say, that it is made up of several
churches or distinct communities, which still remain separate, and although
having certain articles of doctrine in common, nevertheless disagree concerning
the remainder; that these all enjoy the same rights; and that the Church was one
and unique from, at the most, the apostolic age until the first Ecumenical
Councils. Controversies therefore, they say, and longstanding differences of
opinion which keep asunder till the present day the members of the Christian
family, must be entirely put aside, and from the remaining doctrines a common
form of faith drawn up and proposed for belief, and in the profession of which
all may not only know but feel that they are brothers. The manifold churches or
communities, if united in some kind of universal federation, would then be in a
position to oppose strongly and with success the progress of irreligion. This,
Venerable Brethren, is what is commonly said. There are some, indeed, who
recognize and affirm that Protestantism, as they call it, has rejected, with a
great lack of consideration, certain articles of faith and some external
ceremonies, which are, in fact, pleasing and useful, and which the Roman Church
still retains. They soon, however, go on to say that that Church also has erred,
and corrupted the original religion by adding and proposing for belief certain
doctrines which are not only alien to the Gospel, but even repugnant to it.
Among the chief of these they number that which concerns the primacy of
jurisdiction, which was granted to Peter and to his successors in the See of
Rome. Among them there indeed are some, though few, who grant to the Roman
Pontiff a primacy of honor or even a certain jurisdiction or power, but this,
however, they consider not to arise from the divine law but from the consent of
the faithful. Others again, even go so far as to wish the Pontiff Himself to
preside over their motley, so to say, assemblies. But, all the same, although
many non-Catholics may be found who loudly preach fraternal communion in Christ
Jesus, yet you will find none at all to whom it ever occurs to submit to and
obey the Vicar of Jesus Christ either in His capacity as a teacher or as a
governor. Meanwhile they affirm that they would willingly treat with the Church
of Rome, but on equal terms, that is as equals with an equal: but even if they
could so act. it does not seem open to doubt that any pact into which they might
enter would not compel them to turn from those opinions which are still the
reason why they err and stray from the one fold of Christ.
8. This being so, it is clear that the Apostolic See cannot on any terms take
part in their assemblies, nor is it anyway lawful for Catholics either to
support or to work for such enterprises; for if they do so they will be giving
countenance to a false Christianity, quite alien to the one Church of Christ.
Shall We suffer, what would indeed be iniquitous, the truth, and a truth
divinely revealed, to be made a subject for compromise? For here there is
question of defending revealed truth. Jesus Christ sent His Apostles into the
whole world in order that they might permeate all nations with the Gospel faith,
and, lest they should err, He willed beforehand that they should be taught by
the Holy Ghost:[15] has then this doctrine of the Apostles completely vanished
away, or sometimes been obscured, in the Church, whose ruler and defense is God
Himself? If our Redeemer plainly said that His Gospel was to continue not only
during the times of the Apostles, but also till future ages, is it possible that
the object of faith should in the process of time become so obscure and
uncertain, that it would be necessary to-day to tolerate opinions which are even
incompatible one with another? If this were true, we should have to confess that
the coming of the Holy Ghost on the Apostles, and the perpetual indwelling of
the same Spirit in the Church, and the very preaching of Jesus Christ, have
several centuries ago, lost all their efficacy and use, to affirm which would be
blasphemy. But the Only-begotten Son of God, when He commanded His
representatives to teach all nations, obliged all men to give credence to
whatever was made known to them by "witnesses preordained by God,"[16]
and also confirmed His command with this sanction: "He that believeth and
is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be
condemned."[17] These two commands of Christ, which must be fulfilled, the
one, namely, to teach, and the other to believe, cannot even be understood,
unless the Church proposes a complete and easily understood teaching, and is
immune when it thus teaches from all danger of erring. In this matter, those
also turn aside from the right path, who think that the deposit of truth such
laborious trouble, and with such lengthy study and discussion, that a man's life
would hardly suffice to find and take possession of it; as if the most merciful
God had spoken through the prophets and His Only-begotten Son merely in order
that a few, and those stricken in years, should learn what He had revealed
through them, and not that He might inculcate a doctrine of faith and morals, by
which man should be guided through the whole course of his moral life.
9. These pan-Christians who turn their minds to uniting the churches seem, indeed, to pursue the noblest of ideas in promoting charity among all Christians: nevertheless how does it happen that this charity tends to injure faith? Everyone knows that John himself, the Apostle of love, who seems to reveal in his Gospel the secrets of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, and who never ceased to impress on the memories of his followers the new commandment "Love one another," altogether forbade any intercourse with those who professed a mutilated and corrupt version of Christ's teaching: "If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you."[18] For which reason, since charity is based on a complete and sincere faith, the disciples of Christ must be united principally by the bond of one faith. Who then can conceive a Christian Federation, the members of which retain each his own opinions and private judgment, even in matters which concern the object of faith, even though they be repugnant to the opinions of the rest? And in what manner, We ask, can men who follow contrary opinions, belong to one and the same Federation of the faithful? For example, those who affirm, and those who deny that sacred Tradition is a true fount of divine Revelation; those who hold that an ecclesiastical hierarchy, made up of bishops, priests and ministers, has been divinely constituted, and those who assert that it has been brought in little by little in accordance with the conditions of the time; those who adore Christ really present in the Most Holy Eucharist through that marvelous conversion of the bread and wine, which is called transubstantiation, and those who affirm that Christ is present only by faith or by the signification and virtue of the Sacrament; those who in the Eucharist recognize the nature both of a sacrament and of a sacrifice, and those who say that it is nothing more than the memorial or commemoration of the Lord's Supper; those who believe it to be good and useful to invoke by prayer the Saints reigning with Christ, especially Mary the Mother of God, and to venerate their images, and those who urge that such a veneration is not to be made use of, for it is contrary to the honor due to Jesus Christ, "the one mediator of God and men."[19] How so great a variety of opinions can make the way clear to effect the unity of the Church We know not; that unity can only arise from one teaching authority, one law of belief and one faith of Christians. But We do know that from this it is an easy step to the neglect of religion or indifferentism and to modernism, as they call it. Those, who are unhappily infected with these errors, hold that dogmatic truth is not absolute but relative, that is, it agrees with the varying necessities of time and place and with the varying tendencies of the mind, since it is not contained in immutable revelation, but is capable of being accommodated to human life. Besides this, in connection with things which must be believed, it is nowise licit to use that distinction which some have seen fit to introduce between those articles of faith which are fundamental and those which are not fundamental, as they say, as if the former are to be accepted by all, while the latter may be left to the free assent of the faithful: for the supernatural virtue of faith has a formal cause, namely the authority of God revealing, and this is patient of no such distinction. For this reason it is that all who are truly Christ's believe, for example, the Conception of the Mother of God without stain of original sin with the same faith as they believe the mystery of the August Trinity, and the Incarnation of our Lord just as they do the infallible teaching authority of the Roman Pontiff, according to the sense in which it was defined by the Ecumenical Council of the Vatican. Are these truths not equally certain, or not equally to be believed, because the Church has solemnly sanctioned and defined them, some in one age and some in another, even in those times immediately before our own? Has not God revealed them all? For the teaching authority of the Church, which in the divine wisdom was constituted on earth in order that revealed doctrines might remain intact for ever, and that they might be brought with ease and security to the knowledge of men, and which is daily exercised through the Roman Pontiff and the Bishops who are in communion with him, has also the office of defining, when it sees fit, any truth with solemn rites and decrees, whenever this is necessary either to oppose the errors or the attacks of heretics, or more clearly and in greater detail to stamp the minds of the faithful with the articles of sacred doctrine which have been explained. But in the use of this extraordinary teaching authority no newly invented matter is brought in, nor is anything new added to the number of those truths which are at least implicitly contained in the deposit of Revelation, divinely handed down to the Church: only those which are made clear which perhaps may still seem obscure to some, or that which some have previously called into question is declared to be of faith.
10. So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has never
allowed its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics: for the
union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true
Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have
unhappily left it. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, which is visible to
all, and which is to remain, according to the will of its Author, exactly the
same as He instituted it. During the lapse of centuries, the mystical Spouse of
Christ has never been contaminated, nor can she ever in the future be
contaminated, as Cyprian bears witness: "The Bride of Christ cannot be made
false to her Spouse: she is incorrupt and modest. She knows but one dwelling,
she guards the sanctity of the nuptial chamber chastely and modestly."[20]
The same holy Martyr with good reason marveled exceedingly that anyone could
believe that "this unity in the Church which arises from a divine
foundation, and which is knit together by heavenly sacraments, could be rent and
torn asunder by the force of contrary wills."[21] For since the mystical
body of Christ, in the same manner as His physical body, is one,[22] compacted
and fitly joined together,[23] it were foolish and out of place to say that the
mystical body is made up of members which are disunited and scattered abroad:
whosoever therefore is not united with the body is no member of it, neither is
he in communion with Christ its head.[24]
11. Furthermore, in this one Church of Christ no man can be or remain who
does not accept, recognize and obey the authority and supremacy of Peter and his
legitimate successors. Did not the ancestors of those who are now entangled in
the errors of Photius and the reformers, obey the Bishop of Rome, the chief
shepherd of souls? Alas their children left the home of their fathers, but it
did not fall to the ground and perish for ever, for it was supported by God. Let
them therefore return to their common Father, who, forgetting the insults
previously heaped on the Apostolic See, will receive them in the most loving
fashion. For if, as they continually state, they long to be united with Us and
ours, why do they not hasten to enter the Church, "the Mother and mistress
of all Christ's faithful"?[25] Let them hear Lactantius crying out:
"The Catholic Church is alone in keeping the true worship. This is the
fount of truth, this the house of Faith, this the temple of God: if any man
enter not here, or if any man go forth from it, he is a stranger to the hope of
life and salvation. Let none delude himself with obstinate wrangling. For life
and salvation are here concerned, which will be lost and entirely destroyed,
unless their interests are carefully and assiduously kept in mind."[26]
12. Let, therefore, the separated children draw nigh to the Apostolic See,
set up in the City which Peter and Paul, the Princes of the Apostles,
consecrated by their blood; to that See, We repeat, which is "the root and
womb whence the Church of God springs,"[27] not with the intention and the
hope that "the Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the
truth"[28] will cast aside the integrity of the faith and tolerate their
errors, but, on the contrary, that they themselves submit to its teaching and
government. Would that it were Our happy lot to do that which so many of Our
predecessors could not, to embrace with fatherly affection those children, whose
unhappy separation from Us We now bewail. Would that God our Savior, "Who
will have all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the
truth,"[29] would hear us when We humbly beg that He would deign to recall
all who stray to the unity of the Church! In this most important undertaking We
ask and wish that others should ask the prayers of Blessed Mary the Virgin,
Mother of divine grace, victorious over all heresies and Help of Christians,
that She may implore for Us the speedy coming of the much hoped-for day, when
all men shall hear the voice of Her divine Son, and shall be "careful to
keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace."[30]
13. You, Venerable Brethren, understand how much this question is in Our
mind, and We desire that Our children should also know, not only those who
belong to the Catholic community, but also those who are separated from Us: if
these latter humbly beg light from heaven, there is no doubt but that they will
recognize the one true Church of Jesus Christ and will, at last, enter it, being
united with us in perfect charity. While awaiting this event, and as a pledge of
Our paternal good will, We impart most lovingly to you, Venerable Brethren, and
to your clergy and people, the apostolic benediction.
Given at Rome, at Saint Peter's, on the 6th day of January, on the Feast of
the Epiphany of Jesus Christ, our Lord, in the year 1928, and the sixth year of
Our Pontificate.
PIUS XI
No comments:
Post a Comment