THE PERENNIAL NEWNESS OF THE GOSPEL OF LIFE
Introduction
First of all, I wish to thank the organizers of today’s
international meeting for the promotion of the apostolate of respect for
human life. It is my desire, by my presence and with my words, to pay
tribute to your tireless work in defending and
fostering
the inviolability of innocent and defenseless human life from the
moment of conception until the moment of natural death. It is especially
fitting that our meeting is the prelude for the Fourth March for Life
in Rome, at which, in the City of Saints Peter and Paul, so important
and beloved in all the world, an international gathering will give
strong and public witness to the unchanging truth about human life.
My reflection addresses the perennial newness of the
announcement of the good news about human life, made in the image and
likeness of God.
[1] In other words, man can never
tire
of reflecting upon and honoring the immeasurable and unceasing love of
God for the one earthly creature whom He has created for friendship, for
communion, with Himself. In these days when we are celebrating the
Paschal Mystery, how can we not wonder at the love of God for man which
reached its highest and perfect expression in the Incarnation of God the
Son, so that He could win in our human nature the victory over sin and
death, and win for us, for whom he deigned to become a brother, a
lasting share in His own life. God the Son Incarnate – who suffered,
died on the Cross, and rose from the dead – has ascended to the right
hand of God the Father, so that He might be alive for us always in the
Church. Seated in glory at the right hand of the Father, Christ never
ceases to pour forth from His glorious pierced Heart the sevenfold gift
of the Holy Spirit into our hearts. The good news, the gospel of
salvation, is indeed always new, always at work on our behalf in the
Church.
My reflection centers upon the remarkable articulation of
the good news regarding human life by Pope Saint John Paul II in his
Encyclical Letter
Evangelium Vitae. The opening words of the Encyclical Letter underline the critical importance of the daily proclamation of the Gospel of Life:
The Gospel of life is at the heart of Jesus’
message.
Lovingly received day after day by the Church, it is to be preached
with dauntless fidelity as “good news” to the people of every age and
culture.
[2]
The first and most fundamental way of radiating the truth which Our
Lord Jesus never fails to teach us in the Church is a strong witness to
the inviolable dignity of all human life, from the moment of conception
to the moment of natural death. The
personal
conversion and the transformation of the world to which we are called
by Christ must, first of all, find expression in the safeguarding and
fostering of every human life, especially of “the least of these my
brethren,” in
accord with Our Lord’s Parable on the Last Judgment.
[3]
Writing about the mission of the Church in the world,
Pope John Paul II underlined the heart of the mission, declaring:
Every individual precisely by reason of the mystery of the Word of God who was made flesh (cf.
Jn
1:14), is entrusted to the maternal care of the Church. Therefore every
threat to human dignity and life must necessarily be felt in the
Church’s very heart; it cannot but affect her at the core of her faith
in the Redemptive Incarnation of the Son of God, and engage her in her
mission of proclaiming the
Gospel of life in all the world and to every creature (cf.
Mk 16:15).
[4]
The Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, at the very core of Her
being expresses the unconditional, immeasurable, and unceasing love of
God the Father for every man. The pierced Heart of Jesus and the blood
which flowed therefrom is a sign of the “rivers of living water” which
never cease to flow from the glorious Heart of Jesus into the hearts of
all believers, and from their hearts to the hearts of all men.
[5]
Pope John Paul II recalled the profound and enduring
effect of the piercing of the Heart of Jesus after He had died on the
cross for the salvation of all men:
The blood of Christ, while it reveals the grandeur of the Father’s love,
shows how treasured man is in God’s eyes and how inestimable is the good of his life.
[6]
He went on to explain how the blood of Christ reveals the call of every man to care unconditionally for his fellow man:
Furthermore, Christ’s blood reveals to man that his greatness, and therefore his vocation, consists in
the sincere gift of self.
Precisely because it is poured out as the gift of life, the blood of
Christ is no longer a sign of death, of definitive separation from the
brethren, but the instrument of a communion which is richness of life
for all. Whoever in the Sacrament of the Eucharist drinks this blood and
abides in Jesus (cf.
Jn 6:56) is drawn into the dynamism of
his love and gift of life, in order to bring to its fullness the
original vocation to love which belongs to everyone (cf.
Gen 1:27; 2:18-24).
[7]
Participation in the Eucharistic Sacrifice, the highest and most
perfect expression of life in Christ, of communion with the Holy
Trinity, is the ultimate and unfailing source of the inspiration and
strength to safeguard and foster human life. In the words of Pope John
Paul II,
It is from the blood of Christ that all draw
the strength to commit themselves to promoting life. It is precisely this blood that is
the
most powerful source of hope, indeed it is the foundation of the
absolute certitude that in God's plan life will be victorious.
[8]
The first and most important component of the apostolate of respect
for human life is communion with Christ Who is the Gospel of life,
through the Holy Eucharist and Penance, and through their extension by
means of daily prayer and devotion.
I now offer three reflections on the Gospel of life and a
new evangelization. First, I reflect on the relationship of a new
evangelization, and the Gospel of life. Next, I reflect on the
constitutive elements of the Gospel of life. Lastly, I reflect on the
principal means of proclaiming the Gospel of life. The heart of these
reflections is drawn from Pope John Paul II’s Encyclical Letter
Evangelium Vitae,
seen in relationship with the papal magisterium both of Pope Paul VI,
his predecessor, and of Pope Benedict XVI, his successor.
A New Evangelization and the Gospel of Life
By his Apostolic Exhortation
Evangelii Nuntiandi,
“On Evangelization in the Modern World” Pope Paul VI called the Church
to take up the work of a new evangelization. He described evangelization
as the Church’s “… deepest inspiration, that which comes to her
directly from the Lord: To the whole world! To all creation! Right to
the ends of the earth!”
[9] After reflecting on the first
proclamation of the Gospel which “… is addressed to those who have never
heard the Good News of Jesus, or to children,”
[10] he declared:
But, as a result of the frequent situations of dechristianization in
our day, it also proves equally necessary for innumerable people who
have been baptized but who live quite outside Christian life, for simple
people who have a certain faith but an imperfect knowledge of the
foundations of that faith, for intellectuals who feel the need to know
Jesus Christ in a light different from the instruction they received as
children, and for many others.
[11]
The degree of secularization to which Pope Paul VI referred with
concern in 1975 only continues to increase exponentially, also due to a
grave impoverishment or even lack of adequate catechesis in the Church
during the past four decades.
Pope John Paul II addressed the increasing gravity of
this situation with steadfast vigor. The pontificate of Pope John Paul
II, in fact, may be rightly described as a tireless call to recognize
the Church’s challenge to be faithful to her divinely given mission in a
completely secularized society and to respond to the challenge by means
of a new evangelization. A new evangelization consists in teaching the
faith through preaching, catechesis and all forms of Catholic education,
in celebrating the faith in the Sacraments and in prayer and devotion
which are their extension, and in living the faith by the practice of
the virtues – all as if for the first time, that is, with the engagement
and energy of the first disciples and of the first missionaries to our
native place.
In his Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation
Christifideles Laici,
“On the Vocation and the Mission of the Lay Faithful in the Church and
in the World,” Pope John Paul II described the contemporary situation of
the Church in a world which is increasingly secularized, marked by a
pervasive and constant spread of relativism, which “inspires and
sustains a life lived ‘as if God did not exist’”.
[12] Not by chance, in addressing in
Evangelium Vitae
the culture of death which tragically marks a totally secularized
society, he made reference to such a way of living in ignorance of God
and of the order with which He has created the world and, above all,
man. He declared:
By living “as if God did not exist”, man not only loses sight of the
mystery of God, but also of the mystery of the world and the mystery of
his own being.
[13]
He went on to describe the situation which “inevitably leads to a
practical materialism, which breeds individualism, utilitarianism and hedonism,”
[14]
and in which man exchanges his very being for material possessions and
pleasures, rejects suffering as meaningless, and views his body and
sexuality in abstraction from his person.
The consequences for the proclamation of the Gospel of
life are evident. Having described the philosophical foundations of the
culture of death, Pope John Paul II drew this powerful conclusion:
In the materialistic perspective described so far,
interpersonal relations are seriously impoverished.
The first to be harmed are women, children, the sick or suffering, and
the elderly. The criterion of personal dignity – which demands respect,
generosity and service – is replaced by the criterion of efficiency,
functionality and usefulness: others are considered not for who they
“are”, but for what they “have, do and produce”. This is the supremacy
of the strong over the weak.
[15]
For instance, the world today is increasingly witness to the
supremacy of powerful economic and political forces which make the
pretense to define man, and the relationship between man and woman,
apart from the truth of the nature of man, male and female.
To remedy the situation of a totally secularized culture,
the saintly Pontiff observed, “a mending of the Christian fabric of
society is urgently needed in all parts of the world.”
[16] He
hastened to add that, if the remedy is to be effected, the Church
herself must be evangelized anew. Fundamental to understanding the
radical secularization of our culture is to understand also how much
this secularization has entered into the life of the Church Herself.
Pope John Paul II declared:
But for this [the mending of the Christian fabric of society] to come about what is needed is to
first remake the Christian fabric of the ecclesial community itself present in these countries and nations.
[17]
He, therefore, called upon the lay faithful to fulfill
their particular responsibility, that is, “to testify how the Christian
faith constitutes the only fully valid response – consciously perceived
and stated by all in varying degrees – to the problems and hopes that
life poses to every person and society.”
[18] Making more specific
the call, he clarified that the fulfillment of the responsibility of
the lay faithful requires that they “know how to overcome in themselves
the separation of the Gospel from life, to take up again in their daily
activities in family, work and society, an integrated approach to life
that is fully brought about by the inspiration and strength of the
Gospel.”
[19]
Constitutive Elements of the Gospel of Life
What are the constitutive elements of the Gospel of life
which the Church is called to teach, celebrate, and live, in accord with
the demands of a new evangelization?
The Natural Moral Law
The first constitutive element is the truth about the
inviolability of innocent human life written in every human heart. In
other words, the first constitutive element of the Gospel of life is the
natural moral law, of which the first precept is the safeguarding and
promotion of human life.
[20] At the very beginning of
Evangelium Vitae,
Pope John Paul II made clear the relationship of the Church’s teaching
regarding human life to the moral law which can be known by reason. He
declared:
The Church knows that this
Gospel of life, which she has
received from her Lord, has a profound and persuasive echo in the heart
of every person – believer and non-believer alike – because it
marvellously fulfils all the heart’s expectations while infinitely
surpassing them. Even in the midst of difficulties and uncertainties,
every person sincerely open to truth and goodness can, by the light of
reason and the hidden action of grace, come to recognize in the natural
law written in the heart (cf.
Rom 2:14-15) the sacred good of
human life from its very beginning until its end, and can affirm the
right of every human being to have this primary good respected to the
highest degree. Upon the recognition of this right, every human
community and the political community itself are founded.
[21]
What then is the relationship between the natural moral
law and the Church’s moral teaching? While God has first revealed to
every human heart the truth about human life by the Creation, He has
perfectly revealed the truth in all of its splendor by the Redemptive
Incarnation of His only-begotten Son. What is more, the coming of God
the Son as man into the world, His saving Passion, Death, Resurrection,
and Ascension, and His abiding presence in the Church through the
outpouring of the Holy Spirit give man the grace to live fully in accord
with the truth. Pope John Paul II explained the relationship thus:
Through the words, the actions and the very person of Jesus, man is given the possibility of “knowing”
the complete truth
concerning the good of human life. From this “source” he receives, in
particular, the capacity to “accomplish” this truth perfectly (cf.
Jn
3:21), that is, to accept and fulfil completely the responsibility of
loving and serving, of defending and promoting human life. In Christ,
the
Gospel of life is definitively proclaimed and fully given.
This is the Gospel which, already present in the Revelation of the Old
Testament, and indeed written in the heart of every man and woman, has
echoed in every conscience “from the beginning”, from the time of
creation itself, in such a way that, despite the negative consequences
of sin,
it can also be known in its essential traits by human reason.
[22]
The human conscience, if it has not been corrupted by grave confusion
and error, naturally recognizes the inviolable dignity of every human
life and commands that it be safeguarded and promoted.
Natural Moral Law and Conscience
Essentially connected with the discussion of the natural
moral law is the correct understanding of conscience. Pope John Paul II,
relating the intent of his Encyclical Letter, drew particular attention
to the relationship of the Gospel of life with conscience. He wrote:
I wish
to meditate upon once more and proclaim the Gospel of life,
the splendour of truth which enlightens consciences, the clear light
which corrects the darkened gaze, and the unfailing source of
faithfulness and steadfastness in facing the ever new challenges which
we meet along the path.
[23]
He reflected upon the situation of the conscience which “is today
subjected, also as a result of the penetrating influence of the media,
to an
extremely serious and mortal danger: that of
confusion between good and evil, precisely in relation to the fundamental right to life.”
[24] He did not fail to warn about the gravity of the situation, declaring:
When conscience, this bright lamp of the soul (cf.
Mt 6:22-23), calls “evil good and good evil” (
Is 5:20), it is already on the path to the most alarming corruption and the darkest moral blindness.
[25]
At the same time, the very existence of the conscience gives hope of a
transformation of the situation. Pope John Paul II observed:
And yet all the conditioning and efforts to enforce silence fail to
stifle the voice of the Lord echoing in the conscience of every
individual: it is always from this intimate sanctuary of the conscience
that a new journey of love, openness and service to human life can
begin.
[26]
Notwithstanding pervasive confusion and error regarding the
fundamental truth of the inviolable dignity of human life, the Gospel of
life corresponds always to the deepest desire of man, which is to know
and live the truth in love.
It is the conscience, the voice of God speaking to souls,
which is, in the words of Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman, “the
aboriginal Vicar of Christ.”
[27] As such, the conscience is ever
attuned to Christ Himself Who instructs and informs it through His
Vicar, the Roman Pontiff, and the Bishops in communion with the Roman
Pontiff. Blessed Cardinal Newman observed that conscience “is a
messenger of him, who, both in nature and in grace, speaks to us behind a
veil, and teaches and rules us by his representatives.”
[28]
Today, one must be attentive to a false notion of
conscience, which would actually use the conscience to justify sinful
acts. In his 2010 Christmas Address to the Roman Curia, Pope Benedict
XVI reflected at some length on the notion of conscience in the writings
of Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman, contrasting it with a false
notion of conscience which is pervasive in our time.
He described the Church’s understanding of conscience, as faithfully
and brilliantly taught by the Blessed Cardinal Newman, with these words:
In modern thinking, the word “conscience” signifies that for moral
and religious questions, it is the subjective dimension, the individual,
that constitutes the final authority for decision. The world is divided
into the realms of the objective and the subjective. To the objective
realm belong things that can be calculated and verified by experiment.
Religion and morals fall outside the scope of these methods and are
therefore considered to lie within the subjective realm. Here, it is
said, there are in the final analysis no objective criteria. The
ultimate instance that can decide here is therefore the subject alone,
and precisely this is what the word “conscience” expresses: in this
realm only the individual, with his intuitions and experiences, can
decide. Newman’s understanding of conscience is diametrically opposed to
this. For him, “conscience” means man’s capacity for truth: the
capacity to recognize precisely in the decision-making areas of his life
– religion and morals – a truth,
the truth. At the same time,
conscience – man’s capacity to recognize truth – thereby imposes on him
the obligation to set out along the path towards truth, to seek it and
to submit to it wherever he finds it. Conscience is both capacity for
truth and obedience to the truth which manifests itself to anyone who
seeks it with an open heart.
[29]
Conscience, therefore, does not set individuals apart from one
another as arbiters of what is right and good, but unites them in the
pursuit of the one truth, ultimately Our Lord Jesus Christ Who is the
only arbiter of the right and good, so that their thoughts, words and
actions put that truth into practice.
The proclamation of the Gospel of life should be marked
by a profound confidence in the human heart upon which the moral law has
been inscribed. At the same time, it should be ready to refute the
false claim that unconditional respect for the inviolable dignity of
innocent human life is merely a confessional matter and to illustrate
how it is at the very foundation of the common good.
Natural Moral Law, Conscience, and Politics
Later, in the same 2010 Christmas Address, Pope Benedict
XVI recalled his “encounter with the world of culture in Westminster
Hall,”
[30] during his pastoral visit to the United Kingdom,
during which he reflected “on the proper place of religious belief
within the political process.”
[31] Taking inspiration from the example of Saint Thomas More, he addressed directly “the ethical foundations of civil discourse.”
[32] As a service to culture in general, he set forth the Catholic understanding of the matter with these words:
The central question at issue, then, is this: where is the ethical
foundation for political choices to be found? The Catholic tradition
maintains that the objective norms governing right action are accessible
to reason, prescinding from the content of revelation. According to
this understanding, the role of religion in political debate is not so
much to supply these norms, as if they could not be known by
non-believers – still less to propose concrete political solutions,
which would lie altogether outside the competence of religion – but
rather to help purify and shed light upon the application of reason to
the discovery of objective moral principles.
[33]
Pope Benedict XVI noted that the role of religion in public discourse
“is not always welcomed,” for various reasons which can also include
“distorted forms of religion, such as sectarianism and fundamentalism.”
[34]
He observed, however, that such distortions do not justify the
exclusion of religion from public discourse, for “reason too can fall
prey to distortions, as when it is manipulated by ideology, or applied
in a partial way that fails to take account of the dignity of the human
person.”
[35] What remains necessary and true is the right relationship of faith and reason. He concluded:
This is why I would suggest that the world of reason and the world of
faith – the world of secular rationality and the world of religious
belief – need one another and should not be afraid to enter into a
profound and ongoing dialogue, for the good of our civilization.”
[36]
Religion, he continued, “is not a problem for legislators to solve, but a vital contributor to the national conversation.”
[37]
In the light of the irreplaceable role of religion in public life, he
expressed his “concern at the increasing marginalization of religion,
particularly of Christianity, that is taking place in some quarters,
even in nations which place a great emphasis on tolerance.”
[38]
He then gave a telling description of some of the more
troubling manifestations of the effort to alienate religion from the
public forum. His words which I now quote shed light on the absurdity
and indeed moral perversity of a public order which fails to respect the
proper role of religion:
There are those who would advocate that the voice of religion be
silenced, or at least relegated to the purely private sphere. There are
those who argue that the public celebration of festivals such as
Christmas should be discouraged, in the questionable belief that it
might somehow offend those of other religions or none. And there are
those who argue – paradoxically with the intention of eliminating
discrimination – that Christians in public roles should be required at
times to act against their conscience. These are worrying signs of a
failure to appreciate not only the rights of believers to freedom of
conscience and freedom of religion, but also the legitimate role of
religion in the public square.
[39]
Pope Benedict XVI concluded with an invitation to safeguard and
foster the right relationship of faith and reason, which is essential to
the pursuit of the common good, of the good of society. In the 2010
Christmas Address, he concluded his reference to his speech in
Westminster Hall with these urgent words:
This fundamental [moral] consensus derived from the Christian
heritage is at risk wherever its place, the place of moral reasoning, is
taken by the purely instrumental rationality of which I spoke earlier.
In reality, this makes reason blind to what is essential. To resist this
eclipse of reason and to preserve its capacity for seeing the
essential, for seeing God and man, for seeing what is good and what is
true, is the common interest that must unite all people of good will.
The very future of the world is at stake.
[40]
There can be no question of the urgency with which Pope Benedict XVI
was calling Catholics and all persons of good will, in accord with the
new evangelization so steadfastly advanced by Pope John Paul II, to
reverse the decline of western Christian culture by engaging public
discourse with the fundamental truths of the moral law, as taught to us
by reason and illuminated by the Catholic faith.
Inviolable Dignity of Innocent Human Life
Having set forth clearly the natural moral law and its
relationship with Catholic teaching, Pope John Paul II made three
authoritative declarations of the content of the moral law in what
pertains to the Gospel of life. The first statement reads:
Therefore, by the authority which Christ conferred upon Peter and his
Successors, and in communion with the Bishops of the Catholic Church,
I confirm that the direct and voluntary killing of an innocent human being is always gravely immoral.
This doctrine, based upon that unwritten law which man, in the light of
reason, finds in his own heart (cf. Rom 2:14-15), is reaffirmed by
Sacred Scripture, transmitted by the Tradition of the Church and taught
by the ordinary and universal Magisterium.
[41]
Having stated the perennial teaching of the Church regarding the
inviolable dignity of innocent human life, Pope John Paul II made clear
that the conscious and deliberate destruction of an innocent human life
is always and everywhere evil “and can never be licit either as an end
in itself or as a means to a good end.”
[42] Such an act is, in
the words of Pope John Paul II, “a grave act of disobedience to the
moral law, and indeed to God himself, the author and guarantor of that
law; it contradicts the fundamental virtues of justice and charity.”
[43]
Destruction of Innocent Human Life and Procured Abortion
The next two authoritative statements are applications of
the first. The second applies the truth of the inviolable dignity of
innocent human life to the question of procured abortion. Pope John Paul
II declared:
Therefore, by the authority which Christ conferred upon Peter and his
Successors, in communion with the Bishops – who on various occasions
have condemned abortion and who…albeit dispersed throughout the world,
have shown unanimous agreement concerning this doctrine –
I declare that direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, always constitutes a grave moral disorder,
since it is the deliberate killing of an innocent human being. This
doctrine is based upon the natural law and upon the written Word of God,
is transmitted by the Church’s Tradition and taught by the ordinary and
universal Magisterium.
[44]
Although time does not permit the treatment of a number of moral
issues directly related to procured abortion, Pope John Paul II makes
clear that practices like experimentation on human embryos and
selective, so-called “eugenic,” abortion utilizing prenatal diagnostic
techniques are always and everywhere evil.
[45]
Destruction of Innocent Human Life and Euthanasia
The third authoritative statement applies the truth of the inviolable
dignity of innocent human life to the practice of euthanasia. After
having distinguished “an action or omission which of itself and by
intention causes death, with the purpose of eliminating all suffering,”
[46]
from “the decision to forego so-called ‘aggressive medical treatment’,
in other words, medical procedures which no longer correspond to the
real situation of the patient, either because they are by now
disproportionate to any expected results or because they impose an
excessive burden on the patient and his family,”
[47] Pope John Paul II declared:
Taking into account these distinctions, in harmony with the
Magisterium of my Predecessors and in communion with the Bishops of the
Catholic Church,
I confirm that euthanasia is a grave violation of the law of God,
since it is the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of a human
person. This doctrine is based upon the natural law and upon the written
word of God, is transmitted by the Church’s Tradition and taught by the
ordinary and universal Magisterium.
[48]
Once again, time does not permit the discussion of the moral issues
directly related to euthanasia, for example, so-called assisted suicide,
which Pope John Paul II addresses after having enunciated the
authoritative teaching in the matter.
[49]
Principal Means of Proclaiming the Gospel of Life
What then are the principal means of proclaiming the
Gospel of life? The fundamental locus of the proclamation of the Gospel
of life is the family, in which the children witness the Gospel of life
in the relationship of their parents with one another and in the
relationship of the parents with them. Such witness pertains not only to
the beginning of human life, in the correct understanding and living of
human sexuality, but also to the end of life in the acceptance of human
suffering as the way of unconditional love of others, in accord with
the teaching of the Lord which Saint Paul masterfully articulates in the
Letter to the Colossians.
[50] The Gospel of life is integral to
the spiritual worship at the heart of the family. Lifting up their
hearts to the glorious pierced Heart of Jesus in the Eucharistic
sacrifice, parents and children are purified and strengthened to live
Christ’s pure and selfless love in their relationships with each other.
Pope John Paul II declared:
As part of the spiritual worship acceptable to God (cf.
Rom 12:1), the
Gospel of life is to be celebrated above all in
daily living,
which should be filled with self-giving love for others. In this way,
our lives will become a genuine and responsible acceptance of the gift
of life and a heartfelt song of praise and gratitude to God who has
given us this gift. This is already happening in the many different acts
of selfless generosity, often humble and hidden, carried out by men and
women, children and adults, the young and the old, the healthy and the
sick.
[51]
In no. 92 of
Evangelium Vitae, Pope John Paul II treated at length the “
decisive responsibility” of the family for the proclamation of the Gospel of life.
[52]
He illustrated at some length the critical role of the family not only
in teaching the welcome due to new human life but also in teaching the
meaning of suffering and death. As he observed, “[t]he family has a
special role to play throughout the life of its members, from birth to
death.”
[53]
Pope John Paul II, quoting from his homily on the occasion of the
beatification of Saint Gianna Beretta Molla, the heroic apostle of life
of the present time, gave special attention to “brave mothers who devote
themselves to their own family without reserve, who suffer in giving
birth to their children and who are ready to make any effort, to face
any sacrifice, in order to pass on to them the best of themselves.”
[54]
Without in any way diminishing the dignity of the husband and father in
the family, the Gospel of life in the present time particularly
requires a new understanding and lived appreciation of Christian wives
and mothers.
Later on in the Encyclical Letter, Pope John Paul II
devoted special attention to the “unique and decisive” role of women in
the new evangelization and, therefore, in the proclamation of the Gospel
of life.
[55] He declared:
It depends on them to promote a “new feminism” which rejects the
temptation of imitating models of “male domination”, in order to
acknowledge and affirm the true genius of women in every aspect of the
life of society, and overcome all discrimination, violence and
exploitation.
[56]
Reflecting upon motherhood, he further observed:
A mother welcomes and carries in herself another human being,
enabling it to grow inside her, giving it room, respecting it in its
otherness. Women first learn and then teach others that human relations
are authentic if they are open to accepting the other person: a person
who is recognized and loved because of the dignity which comes from
being a person and not from other considerations, such as usefulness,
strength, intelligence, beauty or health. This is the fundamental
contribution which the Church and humanity expect from women. And it is
the indispensable requisite for an authentic cultural change.
[57]
It is clear that the new evangelization regarding the inviolable
dignity of innocent human life, from the moment of conception to the
moment of natural death, depends upon a new proclamation of the truth
regarding woman and motherhood.
[58]
In this regard, it is important to make clear the relationship
between the practice of the virtues of purity, chastity and modesty,
that is the living of the truth regarding human sexuality and human
life, and the practice of justice. Respect for human life is related
essentially to respect for the integrity of marriage and the family. The
attack on the innocent and defenseless life of the unborn has its
origin in an erroneous view of human sexuality, which attempts to
eliminate, by mechanical or chemical means, the essentially procreative
nature of the conjugal act. This error maintains that the artificially
altered act retains its integrity. The claim is that the act remains
unitive or loving, even though the procreative nature of the act has
been radically violated. In fact, it is not unitive, for one or both of
the partners withholds an essential part of the gift of self, which is
the essence of the conjugal union. The so-called “contraceptive
mentality” is essentially anti-life. Many forms of what is called
contraception are in fact abortifacient, that is, they destroy a life
which has already been conceived, has already begun.
The manipulation of the conjugal act, as Pope Paul VI
courageously observed, has led to many forms of violence against
marriage and family life.
[59] Through the spread of the
contraceptive mentality, especially among the young, human sexuality is
no longer seen as the gift of God which draws a man and a woman together
in a bond of lifelong and faithful love, crowned by the gift of new
human life, but, rather, as a tool for personal gratification.
[60]
Once sexual union is no longer seen to be procreative by its very
nature, human sexuality is abused in ways that are profoundly harmful
and indeed destructive of individuals and of society itself. One has
only to think of the devastation which is daily wrought in our world by
the multi-million dollar industry of pornography on the internet.
Fundamental to the transformation of Western culture is the proclamation
of the truth about the conjugal union in its fullness and the
correction of the contraceptive thinking which fears life, which fears
procreation.
It is instructive to note that Pope Benedict XVI, in his Encyclical Letter
Caritas in Veritate, makes special reference to Pope Paul VI’s Encyclical Letter
Humanae Vitae, underscoring its importance “for delineating the
fully human meaning of the development that the Church proposes.”
[61] Pope Benedict XVI makes clear that the teaching in
Humanae Vitae is not simply a matter of “individual morality,” declaring:
Humanae vitae indicates the
strong links between life ethics and social ethics,
ushering in a new area of magisterial teaching that has gradually been
articulated in a series of documents, most recently John Paul II’s
Encyclical Letter
Evangelium Vitae.
[62]
Pope Benedict XVI makes clear the essential part which a right understanding of human sexuality has in true human development.
In treating the question of procreation, Pope Benedict
XVI underscored the critical importance of the right understanding of
human sexuality, marriage and the family. He wrote:
The Church, in her concern for man’s authentic development, urges him
to have full respect for human values in the exercise of his sexuality.
It cannot be reduced merely to pleasure or entertainment, nor can sex
education be reduced to technical instruction aimed solely at protecting
the interested parties from possible disease or the “risk” of
procreation. This would be to impoverish and disregard the deeper
meaning of sexuality, a meaning which needs to be acknowledged and
responsibly appropriated not only by individuals but also by the
community.
[63]
The restoration of respect for the integrity of the conjugal act is
essential to the future of Western culture, the advancement of a culture
of life. In the words of Pope Benedict XVI, it is necessary “once more
to hold up to future generations the beauty of marriage and the family,
and the fact that these institutions correspond to the deepest needs and
dignity of the person.”
[64] Correspondingly, Pope Benedict XVI noted that “States are called to
enact policies promoting the centrality and integrity of the family
founded on marriage between a man and a woman, the primary vital cell
of society, and to assume responsibility for its economic and fiscal
needs, while respecting its essentially relational character.”
[65]
The
Catechism of the Catholic Church reminds us that “[s]o-called
moral permissiveness
rests on an erroneous conception of human freedom” and that “the
necessary precondition for the development of true freedom is to let
oneself be educated in the moral law.”
[66] As is clear from the
above considerations, individual freedom and the freedom of society in
general depend upon a fundamental education in the truth about human
sexuality and the exercise of that truth in a pure and chaste life. The
Catechism of the Catholic Church
goes on to observe: “Those in charge of education can reasonably be
expected to give young people instruction respectful of the truth, the
qualities of the heart, and the moral and spiritual dignity of man.”
[67]
For the Christian, this entails education in holiness of life and in
the respect owed to the inviolable dignity of self, body and soul, and
of others as one’s self.
Evangelium Vitae refers to many more agents and means of the
proclamation of the Gospel of life, such as healthcare workers,
volunteers, educators, civil leaders and legislators, hospitals,
clinics, convalescent homes, Catholic schools and universities, and
other institutions and services which assist individuals and families in
living the truth of the Gospel of life.
[68] Time does not permit an adequate treatment of all of them. I wish, however, to treat briefly two.
In advancing the respect for the inviolable dignity of
innocent human life, proper attention must be given to the laws which
govern the life of society. While the transformation of hearts is the
most fundamental means of the new evangelization, Catholics and all
persons of good will must be attentive to promote laws which safeguard
the dignity of human life. At the same time, one cannot ignore the
irreplaceable role which law plays in culture. Pope John Paul II
observed:
Although laws are not the only means of protecting human life,
nevertheless they do play a very important and sometimes decisive role
in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. I repeat once more that
a law which violates an innocent person’s natural right to life is
unjust and, as such, is not valid as a law. For this reason I urgently
appeal once more to all political leaders not to pass laws which, by
disregarding the dignity of the person, undermine the very fabric of
society.
[69]
In this regard, involvement in political life is essential to the
advancement of the cause of life. Already in his Apostolic Exhortation
Familiaris Consortio, Pope John Paul II had declared:
The social role of families is called upon to find expression also in the form of
political intervention:
families should be the first to take steps to see that the laws and
institutions of the State not only do not offend but support and
positively defend the rights and duties of the family. Along these
lines, families should grow in awareness of being “protagonists” of what
is known as “family politics” and assume responsibility for
transforming society; otherwise families will be the first victims of
the evils that they have done no more than note with indifference.
[70]
The Holy Father repeated the same exhortation to families in
Evangelium Vitae.
[71]
In this context, I cannot fail to note the grave scandal
caused by legislators, judges, and political leaders who profess to be
Catholic and who present themselves to receive Holy Communion, while, at
the same time, they uphold and even promote laws which violate the
moral law in its most fundamental tenets. The Church’s discipline, from
the time of Saint Paul, has admonished those who obstinately persevere
in manifest grave sin not to present themselves for Holy Communion.
[72]
The discipline is not a punishment but the recognition of the objective
condition of the soul of the person involved in such sin. It prevents
them from committing sacrilege by violating the incomparable sanctity of
the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ, and safeguards the
Christian community and the community at large from scandal, that is,
from being led to believe that the violation of the moral law, for
example in what pertains to the inviolable dignity of human life, the
integrity of marriage and the family, and the freedom of conscience, is
not sinful, does not gravely break communion with Our Lord.
Secondly, I underline the importance of developing and
supporting truly pro-life and pro-family media, and of organizing and
sustaining public manifestations in support of the inviolable dignity of
innocent human life and the integrity of the family. The culture of
death advances, in large part, because of a lack of attention and
information among the general public. What is more, the thoroughly
galvanized anti-life and anti-family agenda of the pervasive mass media
confuses and corrupts minds and hearts, and dulls consciences to the law
written by God upon every human heart. Pope John Paul II declared:
What is urgently called for is a
general mobilization of consciences and a
united ethical effort to activate a
great campaign in support of life. All together, we must build a new culture of life:
new, because it will be able to confront and solve today’s
unprecedented problems affecting human life; new, because it will be
adopted with deeper and more dynamic conviction by all Christians; new,
because it will be capable of bringing about a serious and courageous
cultural dialogue among all parties. While the urgent need for such a
cultural transformation is linked to the present historical situation,
it is also rooted in the Church’s mission of evangelization. The purpose
of the Gospel, in fact, is “to transform humanity from within and to
make it new.” Like the yeast which leavens the whole measure of dough
(cf.
Mt 13:33), the Gospel is meant to permeate all cultures
and give them life from within, so that they may express the full truth
about the human person and about human life.
[73]
Pope John Paul II did not fail to note that such efforts must begin with “
the renewal of a culture of life within Christian communities themselves.”
[74]
The Church herself must address the situation of so many of her members
who, even though they may be active in Church activities, “end up by
separating their Christian faith from its ethical requirements regarding
life, and thus fall into moral subjectivism and certain objectionable
ways of acting.”
[75] The words of Pope Francis on May 12, 2013,
to the participants in the Third Annual March for Life in Rome confirmed
the importance of a major public manifestation for the proclamation of
the Gospel of life.
[76]
Conclusion
It is my hope that these reflections inspired by the Encyclical Letter
Evangelium Vitae
have helped to underscore the fundamental place of the Gospel of life
in the new evangelization which must transform the life of the Church
and, through the transformation of the life of the Church, the life of
society. Most of all, I hope that they will lead to a new reading of the
Encyclical Letter as the inspiration and guide for all labors to
overcome the culture of violence and death and to advance the
civilization of life and love.
Before the daunting challenges of Christian living, of advancing the
cause of life, the answer is the placing of hearts totally within the
glorious pierced Heart of Christ. He will transform lives and, through
the conversion of lives, He will transform the world. Christ gave the
Blessed Virgin Mary, His Mother, to His disciples as their mother. She
is constantly drawing hearts to her Immaculate Heart, so that, with her,
faithful disciples may give their hearts totally and forever to Christ.
Thank you. God bless you.
Raymond Leo Cardinal BURKE
[ref zenit.org for footnotes]