His Holiness is not the head of the Church - He's Christ's Vicar -
mandated to uphold, defend and promote apostolic tradition and the
sensus fidelium and the precedential magisterial teaching of his
forebears in the Petrine office...when it comes to matters of
administration and discipline he can do whatever he wants...no
predecessor can ever bind him in that regard...
When he contravenes
that which the Church teaches and refuses to do that which the Church
does in creed, code and cult? When he resorts to heteropraxis and
espouses material heresy at every turn and even resorts to dismantling
Holy Mother Church by undermining its unique identity and dogmatic
dignity by seeking to fragment and decentralise and actuate
autocephalous national churches with independent authorities to
formulate pastoral and doctrinal divergences? [what do you think Synod
was really about? Take a look at the small print in Gaudium Evangelii]
We have direct orders from Innocent III & Pius IX
When a Pope through their own ambition or folly seeks to lead the faithful astray?
Ignore
him - do not follow him - love him, pray for him, obey him in all
things possible which do not contravene one's baptismal duties - but do
not follow him....
On pain of my immortal soul I personally can NEVER judge the sayings
or actions of a Pontiff or arbitrarily declare they are heretical or
apostatic - nor can anyone be they member of the laity or cleric or
religious or Father or Doctor of the Church - ONLY Apostolic Tradition
and the dogma/anathemitisations of truly Oecumenical councils &
Papal predecessors can objectively adjudicate - if a Papal predecessor
sets a doctrinal or moral precedent it becomes magisterial teaching
which a Pope is sworn to uphold, defend and promote - when instead he
does otherwise and says or does that which is contrary? It is his very
predecessors who objectively judge and condemn
eg when Pope St
John Paul said the Holy Spirit works in Protestant Faiths to bring about
God's Kingdom? That's heresy - it is solely through the benefice's of
the Holy Spirit's edification of the One, True, Church that any other
faith can work anything [eg the Catholic Church validates Orthodox
sacraments - Nobody is ever baptised into anything but the One, true,
Church] Mirari Vos of Gregory XVI, Satis Cognitum of Leo XIII, Mortalium
Animos of Pius XI etc etc etc
or when Popes John Paul &
Francis declare the the Old Covenant was never abrogated? That's not
merely heresy it's a lie - I could cite all manner of Church Fathers but
I necessarily need Popes to refute this - and for that I have Eugene IV
at the council of Florence and Pius XII in Mystici Corporis who say the
exact opposite...
Popes bind their successors in faith and morals - they cannot bind in discipline or administration.
Because a Pope binds their successors in faith and morals - they are the binders and looseners who set precedents...
eg
Pope St john Paul II BOUND all Successors in regard to women Priests -
it is intrinsically ontologically impossible for female ordination -
even though Pope Francis said at present that door is closed - in
reality there is neither door nor doorway...
For instance after
Saturday's apostolic exhortation you're going to hear a lot of heresies
and lies bandied about in regard to the sacraments and Grace itself so
let's make a few things clear:
God does not command the impossible
and always readily provides Sufficient Grace for those in a state of
mortal sin to repent of their sin and be absolved in Confession - the
sacrament of mercy. The medicine for all who are spiritually sick
requiring healing
Nobody need ever sin - nobody need ever stay in a state of mortal sin - all are called to a state of Grace.
Holy
communion is NOT a Sacrament of Mercy - it is rather for those upon
whom mercy has been bestowed [ie via confession] as a Sacramental Grace
in the form of spiritual food - NOT MEDICINE.
You will hear the
analogy of the field hospital on the spiritual battlefield and a
twisting and misattribution of Holy Communion being part of that healing
surgery/medicine - NOT TRUE.
Holy Communion is for the Healthy - for
the sick it is like poison as it is unworthily received - it places
Christ in a hostile temple.
Therefore all those in a state of
mortal sin CANNOT and MUST NOT receive the Blessed Sacrament - but MUST
first convert, change their lives, repent and receive absolution - then
they are able to receive.
there is NOTHING preventing this - it is not impossible - the Grace is readily available for anyone to repent and be absolved.
BUT
if they choose otherwise and prefer for all manner of reasons to reject
that grace and remain in mortal sin? They are forbidden from receiving
Holy Communion
That's what the Church teaches and commands - the
doctrine and the pastoral applications of that doctrine are inextricably
linked - you cannot contradict or defy one without scandalising and
defying the other.
There is no arbitrary discretion or possible
delegation of pastoral authority to determine otherwise - not even God
can permit someone in a state of mortal sin to receive Holy communion -
let alone a Pope or delegated Bishop or Parish Priest.
Those in
mortal sin cannot receive - there is no potential appeal to excusing or
tolerating or claiming it is merciful - I repeat - Confession is the
bestower of the Grace of Mercy - NEVER Communion.
Although
Catholic commentators and media-luvvies and a myriad of professional
clerics will inform you this is merely a matter of discipline?
IT IS NOT.
Holy Mother Church s bound to this doctrine and physical pastoral manifestation of this doctrine - to the end of the World.
You
might also hear of the delegated internal forum [eg conference, Bishop
or parish priest] - or the setting of a pentential period -determining a
candidate's worth for reception of Communion.
THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE -
ONLY Confession can bestow the Grace of Mercy removing that mortal sin -
only metanoia and a firm purpose of amendment can make the peron
eligible to receive communion.
You might also hear a perverted
distortion of the principle of the sensus fidelium - ie that which the
faithful have thought, said and done in the creed code and cult of the
church for millennia...
It instead being portrayed as mere modern
manifestation of the Catholic zeitgeist's collective democratic will of
the laity...eg the majority want to see changes to Church teaching on
homosexuality or contraception being portrayed as the working of the
Holy Spirit within the sensus fidelium manifesting the need for
change...
IT'S A LIE
You might also hear that in appeal to the
principle of subsidiarity a Pope is able to executively delegate as a
mere discipline His Petrine power to adjudicate, discern and determine
doctrine, morality and their pastoral application to decentralised
autocephalous national churches.
[Pope Francis implied as much in Evangelii Gaudium]
A POPE CANNOT.
There
is but One Church, One Faith and one manifest creed, code and cult [in
various rites] - that CANNOT be divided or devolved or allowed to become
a confederation of autonomous and independent from its centre.
Peter
is the sole binder and loosener - he is the Keeper of the Keys - he
cannot relinquish or abdicate or delegate that executive authority to
others
This is NOT a matter of discipline but the entire manifest ecclesial structure of the Church Militant - it is ONE UNDER PETER.
So
if Pope Francis declares any in mortal sin may receive communion -
that's a lie and a heresy - if he declares that decision is arbitrary or
discretionary in an internal forum or penitential path which does not
include absolution in confession? That is also a lie and a heresy.
If
he declares that it is impossible for any sinner to repent of their sin
now and receive the Sacrament of Mercy in confession now?
That's a
heresy against the Sufficient Grace and loving Charity of God known as
Gradualism - and a lie saying God commands the impossible when He never
does!
and if Pope Francis suggests that this is merely a disciplinary
issue which he can arbitrarily determine without his pontfical mandate
to uphold all tradition and magisterial teaching and its pastoral
enactment? - that's a heresy and a lie
if he suggests such determinations may be made on a localised level through autocephalous Churches? a heresy and a lie
if
he or any other suggests any potential initiation of this scandalous
sacrilege is through the working of the Holy Spirit or an embodiment of
Apostolic tradition or God's will being made known through the
collective will of the 'sensus fidelium' ?
More heresies and lies....
So look out over the next few days for the exhortation and any accompanying motu proprio...
Cardinal Muller has already reminded His Holiness what he can and cannot do...
Let's see if His Holiness thinks otherwise...
Because potentially? The roof might be about to cave in!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment